Thursday, April 9, 2009
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Shattered Glass
1. The fact checkers ask the writer for their source's contact information.
2. At first, Lane is very angry with him but that changes to Lane losing all respect for Glass.
3. Glass has very close friendships with his co-workers and this helps when it comes to taking sides. He makes it seem like it wasn't completely his fault.
4. He has his brother pretend he is one of his sources and makes a website for Jukt Micronics.
5. He tells Lane he is under a lot of pressure.
6. If Glass is fired, others from the New Republic will quit.
2. At first, Lane is very angry with him but that changes to Lane losing all respect for Glass.
3. Glass has very close friendships with his co-workers and this helps when it comes to taking sides. He makes it seem like it wasn't completely his fault.
4. He has his brother pretend he is one of his sources and makes a website for Jukt Micronics.
5. He tells Lane he is under a lot of pressure.
6. If Glass is fired, others from the New Republic will quit.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Peer edit- Jeff Curry
1. Yes. Binge drinking needs to be stopped.
2. It states the problem but not the solution.
3. It needs to address the counter arguments. Get views on this issue from college students since they are most likely to fall to binge drinking.
4. Yes. It give interesting information on an important topic.
5. Split it into paragraphs. A good break is at "I think ..."
6. After you split it up, try to include more of your opinion.
7. Yes.
2. It states the problem but not the solution.
3. It needs to address the counter arguments. Get views on this issue from college students since they are most likely to fall to binge drinking.
4. Yes. It give interesting information on an important topic.
5. Split it into paragraphs. A good break is at "I think ..."
6. After you split it up, try to include more of your opinion.
7. Yes.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Peer edit- Jack Sullivan
1. Yes
2. It states the problem, but not the solution
3. It doesn't address the counter arguments. Include information on how the police would defend their side.
4. Yes. It's something that most students have expierenced so it's easy to relate to.
5. It's not split into paragraphs yet. An intro, body paragraphs, and conclusion would help. A natural break would be the part where you discuss your accident.
6. Each paragraph will have an idea once split up.
7. The writing is clear. It proves your point very well. There are some grammar errors that can easily be fixed.
2. It states the problem, but not the solution
3. It doesn't address the counter arguments. Include information on how the police would defend their side.
4. Yes. It's something that most students have expierenced so it's easy to relate to.
5. It's not split into paragraphs yet. An intro, body paragraphs, and conclusion would help. A natural break would be the part where you discuss your accident.
6. Each paragraph will have an idea once split up.
7. The writing is clear. It proves your point very well. There are some grammar errors that can easily be fixed.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Editorial Final Draft
The University of North Dakota is known for their hockey team, especially due to team’s success in the WCHA Final Five Tournament. Unfortunately, the university is also known for the controversy following the Sioux mascot.
Over the past few years, this issue has become a popular topic in the media, attracting the attention of many. The University of North Dakota is not the first case, as it can be seen in many professional teams as well. It is obvious to see why Native American tribes would find examples like the Florida State Seminoles offensive. White college students dressing up like faux Native Americans and stabbing a mascot representing the opposing school? Really? That's going too far. In the case of the Sioux, no actions like this are being performed. The Sioux name has been used for 30 years, and since then it has become an important part of the institution, a rich tradition. While Native American tribes of North Dakota and the NCAA have recently viewed it as offensive, the question on the minds of many is, “Why now?”. One reason might be that due to the hockey team’s success; the name has been displayed more, bringing more attention to the school. The university has been given until 2010 to gain the support of the state’s Sioux tribes. However, the possibility of this happening is not promising. What is to happen to that rich tradition if the logo and mascot are taken away? It’s important to think about every athlete who has put on a Sioux uniform. Every time they take to the court or ice, the picture on the front is meant to represent strength and honor, not disrespect. If the support needed in 2010 is not gained, athletes won’t feel what athletes before their time had felt. Another viewpoint to take in this situation is one of a student. While it is impossible to speak for the entire university student body, many students would say that the issue doesn’t have the intensity it once had. In fact, many students would say they support keeping the logo and mascot the way it currently is. Unfortunately, the students can't make the final decision.
In the end, the fate of the University of North Dakota’s logo and mascot are in the hands of North Dakota’s Sioux tribes. While the public can voice their opinions on the topic, nothing is certain as to what will happen. However, one thing is certain: the University of North Dakota will deal with more changes than just a mascot and logo.
Over the past few years, this issue has become a popular topic in the media, attracting the attention of many. The University of North Dakota is not the first case, as it can be seen in many professional teams as well. It is obvious to see why Native American tribes would find examples like the Florida State Seminoles offensive. White college students dressing up like faux Native Americans and stabbing a mascot representing the opposing school? Really? That's going too far. In the case of the Sioux, no actions like this are being performed. The Sioux name has been used for 30 years, and since then it has become an important part of the institution, a rich tradition. While Native American tribes of North Dakota and the NCAA have recently viewed it as offensive, the question on the minds of many is, “Why now?”. One reason might be that due to the hockey team’s success; the name has been displayed more, bringing more attention to the school. The university has been given until 2010 to gain the support of the state’s Sioux tribes. However, the possibility of this happening is not promising. What is to happen to that rich tradition if the logo and mascot are taken away? It’s important to think about every athlete who has put on a Sioux uniform. Every time they take to the court or ice, the picture on the front is meant to represent strength and honor, not disrespect. If the support needed in 2010 is not gained, athletes won’t feel what athletes before their time had felt. Another viewpoint to take in this situation is one of a student. While it is impossible to speak for the entire university student body, many students would say that the issue doesn’t have the intensity it once had. In fact, many students would say they support keeping the logo and mascot the way it currently is. Unfortunately, the students can't make the final decision.
In the end, the fate of the University of North Dakota’s logo and mascot are in the hands of North Dakota’s Sioux tribes. While the public can voice their opinions on the topic, nothing is certain as to what will happen. However, one thing is certain: the University of North Dakota will deal with more changes than just a mascot and logo.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Editorial Pre-writing
1. The University of North Dakota was under pressure to change their mascot name.
2. I believe that it isn't offensive and the mascot shouldn't have to change.
3. While I see where others are coming from, the mascot name is not meant to be disrespectful
4.
1. Other examples of Native American mascots in NCAA and prefessional sports
2. The name is part of the tradition and institution
3. Fighting Sioux is meant to represent strength and pride, not be disrespectful
4. Most students tend to support the current mascot
5. To motivate readers, I will suggest that they voice their own opinions on the subject.
6. This editorial makes people aware that this is an important and controversial topic.
2. I believe that it isn't offensive and the mascot shouldn't have to change.
3. While I see where others are coming from, the mascot name is not meant to be disrespectful
4.
1. Other examples of Native American mascots in NCAA and prefessional sports
2. The name is part of the tradition and institution
3. Fighting Sioux is meant to represent strength and pride, not be disrespectful
4. Most students tend to support the current mascot
5. To motivate readers, I will suggest that they voice their own opinions on the subject.
6. This editorial makes people aware that this is an important and controversial topic.
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Feature Story
There are many high school runners across the country, many who have an incredible amount of talent and potential. However, those who choose to continue to use their abilities in college need to be aware of the amount of work and effort they will need to put forward and the difference from high school environment.
However, there are many reasons to look forward to continuing training at a higher level than before. If one isn't prepared for the changes at hand, the transition from high school to college might not go as planned.
There is no doubt that the college atmosphere is completely different than high school. The competition is much more intense, not only from the opposing schools but from your own teammates. David Pachuta, a distance runner at the University of Minnesota, knows how much the competition changes from high school to college. “When it comes to running in college, there’s always the possibility of losing your spot because there’s so much more competition at this level”, says Pachuta. When it comes to high school sports, everyone is encouraged to participate, regardless of skill level. That being said, there isn’t as much pressure put on high school athletes, but the pressure changes as one moves on to college.
High school sports, like previously mentioned, encourage participation. They also provide motivation for academic success if nothing else. However, that isn’t the purpose of collegiate athletics. The fun, encouraging atmosphere is replaced by a desire for a winning team and incredible motivation. It basically comes down to the runner’s mindset. Not only will the atmosphere be different, but coaching will also vary greatly in college sports. Tom Sharp, an Eastview teacher and cross country and track and field coach says, “In high school, there’s more of a social aspect to the sport and the coaches are more compassionate. There shouldn’t be a need to motivate runners in college; they should already have the desire in them.” It’s also important to remember that, depending on the school, the size of the team will be much smaller. No matter what the school size is, they have room for a certain amount of runners. That means the coach will pick the best runners, regardless of how old they are. While the coaching styles are much different, it’s just that difference that promotes a winning team.
There are many changes when it comes to training as well. In many high schools, cross country and outdoor and indoor track are offered, leaving time in between to train. However, most collegiate runners are training nine months out of the year. If not red shirted, this might be a huge change for any new runner. Shannon Braun, the Eagan cross country and track and field coach, as well as former University of Montana distance runner, experienced this change first hand. Braun says, “During the season, we focused on long intervals with more speed, while focusing on long, base-building runs with strength sessions when not competing.” In order to be prepared for a new training program, proper training and knowledge is required.
If the final decision is made to transition from high school running to collegiate running, one must be prepared for a huge difference in training. It all starts with running during the summer prior to freshman year. The first step is to find out what training regiment the team. This is important because it helps the runner learn what’s in store for them. Also, more speed work will be required since it is incorporated more into collegiate-level training. However, there is usually a prerequisite, even if it is a Division III school; running in varsity meets in high school. Sharp has a good idea of this since he has seen many of his runners go on to compete in college. “They have to put the time in, and that means being a consistent varsity runner.”
If a high school runner is aware of all the differences and accepts them, they need to ask themselves one question: how much do I love running? If the love of the sport is not there, it might not be a good choice to continue. There is certainly much to look forward to for the next stage in competition. Ian Sharp, an Eastview runner, says “I’m looking forward to better competition and running for a championship team.” There are other advantages as well.
For a high school runner unsure about their future, knowing what’s to come will help make a decision.
If a high school runner is aware of all the differences and accepts them, they need to ask themselves one question: how much do I love running? If the love of the sport is not there, it might not be a good choice to continue. There is certainly much to look forward to for the next stage in competition. Ian Sharp, an Eastview runner, says “I’m looking forward to better competition and running for a championship team.” There are other advantages as well.
For a high school runner unsure about their future, knowing what’s to come will help make a decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
